phynedyning

Libertarian versus Libertarian-leaning, an example

In Intro to Libertarianism on November 5, 2012 at 10:22 am

[Editor’s Note: This is an excellent summary of libertarian-leaning principles. I’ve added a bit of commentary because I am often troubled by assertions made by (my words) ‘incomplete libertarians’ who claim to be anarcho-capitalists, libertarian-socialists, anarchists, or libertarians except when they talk about traditionally Christian-fascist bogeymen like feminism, GLBT issues, and abortion. Aside from that, Vance provides a concise and elegant summary of libertarian-leaning beliefs. I am also a bit troubled that some libertarians continue to assert nonsensically “the best tax is the least tax”. That is like saying, “Robbery and grand theft is bad, but petty larceny and shoplifting are just fine.” Theft is theft…no matter the degree. All taxation is theft. Our differences underscore the ideological differences between ‘libertarian’ (traditional liberal – myself, Chomsky, Rose, Bakunin, and Kropotkin) versus ‘libertarian-leaning’ (Vance, LaBaume, Rockwell, and Ron Paul). Libertarian-leaning is NOT synonymous with ‘libertarian’. PD]

Please remove me from your mailing list, “I’m just totally uninterested in your view of politics,” wrote a former student and friend.

I have been described (and dismissed) by some of my former friends as anti-war, libertarian, isolationist, or anti-government, not so much because they think that one word encapsulates my political philosophy, but because they are ignorant of U.S. history, the U.S. military, the U.S. government, U.S. foreign policy, and their own Bible that they profess to believe.

[Unfortunately, Vance later uses his own Bible (or some mystical ‘whatever’) to demonize abortion as ‘morally wrong’.]

Although I am a student of, and a commentator on, politics, I am not political in any way. I don’t vote. I don’t donate to political campaigns. I don’t endorse candidates. I don’t campaign for anyone. I don’t frequent political events. I don’t watch political debates. I loathe politicians, and especially members of Congress, of whom Mark Twain said: “There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”

But what’s not to like about my “view of politics”? What could possibly be so bad about it? And what is my “view of politics” that some conservatives, evangelicals, and Red-State Christian fascists find so uninteresting?

I have assembled this brief explanation of my “view of politics.” I am using the word politics in its broadest sense, as is common. Some of my views are best explained by quotes from others that I like. Not in any particular order, here are twelve propositions that make up my “view of politics.”

On the state, I believe with Lew Rockwell that the state is “a gang with a flag.” I believe with Murray Rothbard that the state is “a bandit gang writ large.” It is “a vast criminal organization far more formidable and successful than any ‘private’ Mafia in history.” I agree with H. L. Mencken that “every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under” and that “all government is, in its essence, organized exploitation, and in virtually all of its existing forms it is the implacable enemy of every industrious and well-disposed man.” I also agree with Voltaire that “the art of government is to make two-thirds of a nation pay all it possibly can pay for the benefit of the other third.”

[I am amazed that ‘evolved’ man continues to believe in the myth of the ‘goodness’ of the state. Anarchist Larken Rose aptly describes ‘patriotism’ as: Having been trained to feel a blind loyalty to the ruling class of the particular piece of dirt they live on.” I would add that the ruling class adds, as its surrogate fetish, a bit of colored cloth on a stick ( sic ‘a flag’) to which the masses are expected to genuflect, bow, and swear allegiance (obedience) to.]

On economics, I believe that laissez faire is natural, moral, and biblical. I oppose all government regulations and any government intervention in the economy for any reason. I also subscribe to Richman’s law: “No matter how much the government controls the economic system, any problem will be blamed on whatever small zone of freedom that remains.”

[Arrrgghhh! Why did Vance feel compelled to say laissez faire economics is ‘biblical’? It is enough that it is ‘natural’ and ‘moral’ (I would have said ‘ethical’.). His bible (or mine) has no place in any discussion about legitimacy of something where it involves others who may not subscribe to his (or my) ‘Big Book of Unprovable Myths and Legends’.]

On taxes, I believe that taxation is theft. I believe with Frank Chodorov that the income tax is the root of all evil. But as long as we have taxes, I believe with J. B. Say that the “best” tax is the lightest. I therefore subscribe to the Rockwell rule when it comes to any tax reform proposal: “Does it reduce or eliminate an existing tax?” And I believe that tax breaks, tax shelters, tax incentives, tax deductions, tax loopholes, tax exemptions, and tax credits are always good because they allow people to keep more of their money in their pocket and out of the hands of the government.

[I submit that supporting the ‘least tax is the best tax’ only perpetuates the crime of legitimized theft by making it palatable to the point that it’s poison is not tasted. If there are no tax breaks, tax shelters, tax incentives, tax deductions, tax loopholes, tax exemptions, or tax credits…the pain and illegitimacy of taxation is felt by all. The more people oppressed by a tax, the more of them will oppose the taxation and it will go away. Tax breaks, tax shelters, tax incentives, tax deductions, tax loopholes, tax exemptions, and tax credits are analogous to exempting certain people from the peril of being robbed, simply because of who they are.]

On the Democratic Party, I believe with Strom Thurmond, who left the Democratic Party in 1964 because it was “leading the evolution of our nation to a socialistic dictatorship.” The Democratic Party is the party of liberalism, socialism, feminism, collectivism, abortion, organized labor, big government, environmentalism, affirmative action, welfare, paternalism, taxing and spending, income redistribution, and every alternative lifestyle known to man. That is, the Democratic Party stands for everything I oppose. I think the last good Democratic president was Grover Cleveland.

[I am often perplexed that feminism gives so many libertarians heartburn. If they are opposed to substituting male domination with equally offensive female domination, I’m on board with them. True feminism does not seek to replace misogyny with misadrony. On the other hand, if feminists seek only full parity with males, I’m on board with them. Many pseudo libertarians get a proportionate amount of heartburn by same-sex relationships (couched by Vance as ‘every alternative lifestyle known to man’). Why? “It’s unnatural.” Says who? “My Big Book of Unprovable Myths and Legends!” Then, YOU shouldn’t have a same-sex relationship. A libertarian doesn’t care about what his neighbors do consensually in matters of sex.]

On the Republican Party, I don’t think it is the lesser of two evils; I think it is pure evil. When Republicans say they believe in limited government, they only mean that they want a government limited to one controlled by Republicans. They are the party of war, torture, empire, militarism, the warfare state – and the welfare state. That is, the Republican Party stands for everything I oppose. All the talk by Republicans about the Constitution, the free market, and limited government is just a bunch of hot air – as is the Republican Party platform, Republican “Pledge to America,” and books by Republican “leaders.”

On voting, I believe with whomever said that it “just encourages the bastards.” I agree with Noam Chomsky that “if voting could actually change anything, it would be illegal,” with Mark Twain that “if voting made a difference, they wouldn’t let us do it,” and with Charles Bukowski that “the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting.”

On foreign policy, I believe with Thomas Jefferson that the best foreign policy is “peace, commerce, honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none.” U.S. foreign policy is reckless, belligerent, and meddling, and has been for over 100 years.

On war, I believe with Benjamin Franklin that “there was never a good war or a bad peace.” I see nothing good about a “good war” (WWII) in which 50 million people died, the majority of whom were civilians. I also like Ike when he said about the atomic bombing of Japan that “it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing.” I believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are especially senseless, unjust, and immoral. I agree with Randolph Bourne that “war is the health of the state.”

On the U.S. military, I believe that instead of being a “global force for good,” it is a global force for evil. Not only should the military not be fighting foreign wars, no U.S. soldier should be stationed anywhere but on American soil. All 1,000 foreign bases should be closed, and all U.S. troops should be brought home. The sooner the better. And

On liberty, I believe, with Leonard Read, that people have the fundamental right to do “anything that’s peaceful” as long as it is not aggressing against someone else’s person or property. I believe, with Lysander Spooner, that vices are not crimes. I subscribe to the libertarian non-aggression principle; that is, it is wrong to threaten or initiate violence against someone unless in defense of one’s person or property.

On abortion, I believe that abortion is not only morally wrong, but violates libertarianism’s non-aggression principle. However, I part company with pro-lifers because I don’t believe the federal government has any more authority to concern itself with abortion than it does to concern itself with the amount of parking ticket fines in the fifty states. And I also extend my pro-life sentiments to children and adults in foreign countries on the receiving end of U.S. bombs and bullets.

[Unfortunately, ‘libertarian’ Vance now salutes the flag of Christio-fascism with his opposition to abortion. He does so with the false assertion that abortion ‘violates libertarianism’s non-aggression principle’. Nonsense! If you invited friends to your home and then decided (long after they arrived) that you would rather spend the evening alone, you would be well within your rights to ask them to leave. If they refused, you are entitled to remove them through the use of force. It is creative anthropomorphism at its best to assume that a fetus is a ‘person’ with rights greater than the rights of the person hosting it inside her body. If you are a true libertarian and you are opposed to abortion, don’t have one. To call it ‘murder’ is to beg for the state to enforce rules from your own ‘big book of myths’ (whatever bible you use). At their root, they are less concerned with the welfare of their fanciful ‘baby’ than they are with the ‘morality’ of how it became fixed to the mother’s uterine wall…paleo-Puritanism beliefs that sexual pleasure must be countered with some kind punishment…quid pro quo. Don’t like abortion…don’t have one. Yes, it’s that simple.]

On gun control, I believe gun control is being able to hit your target. And unlike some in the NRA, I actually believe that the Second Amendment prohibits the federal government from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms. That is, the federal government has no authority to ban or regulate any gun of any caliber or type, any ammunition, any magazines, any gun sales or purchases, or any gun shows. And the federal government has no authority to set up a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms since it has no authority to ban or regulate alcohol, tobacco, or firearms.

I’m sure I am missing something. But the above, in a large nutshell, is my view of politics that some are uninterested in.

November 5, 2012

Laurence M. Vance writes from central Florida. He is the author of Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State, The Revolution that Wasn’t, Rethinking the Good War, and The Quatercentenary of the King James Bible. His latest book is The War on Drugs Is a War on Freedom.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: